[Editor’s Note: This is an edited excerpt of a BreakPoint Podcast where John Stonestreet and Shane Morris replied to a series of questions from the Colson Center audience. You may hear the entire conversation here.]
From the Colson Center audience:
“My question is this, how, if at all, does your eschatology affect how you engage culture? I would assume in very crass terms that an amillennialism view lends itself to more of a call to redeem culture while a pre-millennial view understands that culture is only in a downward spiral with no help for redemption until Christ comes. I would love to hear your thoughts on this.”
The Colson Center replies:
That is a great question. I actually get this a lot, not because I ever lead with eschatology or because my vision of engaging or understanding culture has anything to do specifically with my eschatology.
That’s not to say that eschatology doesn’t influence other things. But it doesn’t have to, and I don’t think it should. Here’s why.
First, there are strong believers in Scripture and different streams of thought in the history of the Church that influenced views of eschatology. No single view of eschatology has any stranglehold on Christian or biblical faithfulness.
We can all disagree about what will happen at the End, but we can all agree on what Jesus Christ Himself says: “Behold, I am making all things new.” Now, whether that comes through fire, through the Church, through restoration, of some other form, that’s the end of the story – A new heavens and a new Earth. That restoration is what we can stand on.
Second, think of the way Scripture speaks about the End. When Paul refers to the second coming of Christ, he says that we are to comfort one another with these words. That’s usually not how we use eschatology. We usually use eschatology to scare one another with these words.
The end of the world is a very strong motivator, and it’s not always wrong. Jesus was very clear that the return of the Bridegroom is not only something that comforts us, but it’s also something that motivates us. It’s not, however, something that should lead us to fear. It’s something that, for the follower of Christ, should be a time of expectation.
So, where does that leave engaging culture?
Yes, it’s true that people who have had certain views of the end times have basically said that it’s pointless to engage culture. But most of them still have a job, and most of them still vote, and most of them still try to build their business in order to create wealth and secure long-term, wise planning for their kids. Most of them are involved in mission efforts that both share the gospel and feed the hungry, and most are involved in other ways in which culture is engaged.
Sometimes you get this from certain quotes. D. L. Moody, for example, said engaging culture is like rearranging the deck chairs on a sinking ship. But Moody did remarkable work in inner city Chicago and supported the missions of various inner-city projects. Not to engage culture is actually not possible because we’re human. To be human is to be in a cultural moment; to be in a cultural moment is to be involved in cultural activities, like it or not.
How that happens is one question. Jesus Christ is making all things new, that story of Scripture goes from creation to new creation, from the heavens and Earth to the new heavens and Earth, from the garden to the garden and the city, the curse being overturned.
I always tell people, “Listen, whatever you think about the how, here’s what you need to do. Take Genesis 1 through 11 and then Revelation 7 through 21 and read them side by side and watch what happens.” What you see is that the end of the story is actually a new beginning. It’s a restoration of creation.
The reason we should engage culture is not eschatology. It has been driven by eschatology, but it shouldn’t be. The reason we should engage culture is because of the way we were created. God created human beings to be fruitful, multiply, fill the Earth and subdue it. The curse happened and we’re told that the filling will hurt and the farming or forming will be tough, but we’re still filling, and forming.
To be that sort of cultural creature is true no matter what. We live our life under now the authority of Christ, and all of our life, every square inch, as Abraham Kuyper would say, is to be done under the lordship of Christ, every square inch of our lives. It’s more of an act of obedience than a strategy for ushering in the reign of Christ.
Editor’s Note: This is part of an ongoing series where Colson Center staff respond to questions and comments from our audience.
If there is an issue you would like to see addressed, send an email to email@example.com
If Christianity is true, as we say it is, then Christians should be willing and able to offer what Francis Schaeffer called “honest answers to honest questions.”
You can go here to see more questions like this one.
Posted questions may be edited for form or clarity but not for content.